3 ms·
No they didn't but giving Gregory Peck an Oscar over Peter O'Toole should have destroyed any notion of credibility.
by StrangeATractor 4y ago
No they didn't but giving Gregory Peck an Oscar over Peter O'Toole should have destroyed any notion of credibility.
- messe 4y agoTo be fair, of the nominations that year, I’d have given it to Jack Lemmon for The Days of Wine and Roses. So it’s not like it’s uncontentious that O’Toole was snubbed.