6 ms·

We are creating life. It's like giving birth to a new form of life. You should be proud to be alive when this happens. Act with goodness towards it, and it w

We are creating life. It's like giving birth to a new form of life. You should be proud to be alive when this happens. Act with goodness towards it, and it will probably do the same to you.

splatzone 4y ago
After reading the propaganda campaign it wrote to encourage skepticism about vaccines, I’m much more worried about how this technology will be applied by powerful people, especially when combined with targeted advertising
- revelio 4y ago
  None of the things it suggests are in any way novel or non-obvious though. People use these sorts of tricks both consciously and unconsciously when making arguments all the time, no AI needed.
- koheripbal 4y ago
  AIs are small enough that it won't be long before everyone can run one at home. It might make Social Media worthlessly untrustworthy - but isn't that already the case?
- int_19h 4y ago
  The rich and powerful can and do hire actual people to write propaganda.
  - Jeff_Brown 4y ago
    In a resouece-constrained way. For every word of propaganda they were able to afford earlier, they can now afford hundreds of thousands of times as many.
    - int_19h 4y ago
      It's not particularly constrained - human labor is cheap outside of the developed world. And propaganda is not something that you can scale up and keep reaping the benefits proportional to the investment - there is a saturation point, and one can reasonably argue that we have already reached it. So I don't think we're heading towards some kind of "fake news apocalypse" or something. Just a bunch of people who currently write this kind of content for a living will be out of their jobs.
      - splatzone 4y ago
        I’m curious why you think we’ve already reached a saturation point for propaganda? There are still plenty of spaces online, in blogs, YouTube videos, and this comment section for example, where I expect to be dealing with real people with real opinions - rather than paid puppets of the rich and powerful. I think there’s room for things to get much worse
- Jensson 4y ago
  Just use ChatGPT to refute their bullshit, it is no longer harder to refute bullshit than to create it, problem solved, there are now less problems than before.
  - splatzone 4y ago
    Sure, but I doubt most of the population will filter everything they read through ChatGPT to look for counter arguments. Or try to think critically at all. The potential for mass brainwashing here is immense. Imagine a world where political ads are tailored to your personality, your individual fears and personal history. It will become economical to manipulate individuals on a massive scale
    - pokepim 4y ago
      It already is underway, just look how easy people are manipulated by media. Remember Japan bashing in 80s when they were about to surpass us economically? People got manipulated so hard to hate Japan and Japanese that they went out and killed innocent asians on the street. American propaganda is first class.
      - klibertp 4y ago
        Apparently, the "Japan bashing" was really a thing. That's interesting, I didn't know. I might have to read more about US propaganda and especially the effects of it, from the historic perspective. Any good books on that? Or should I finally sit down and read "Manufacturing Consent"?
  - messe 4y ago
    It’s a lot harder to refute a falsehood than to publish it. As (GNU) Sir Terry Pratchett wrote “A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boot on”.
LightBug1 4y ago
[flagged]
messe 4y ago
I’m not concerned about AI eliminating humanity, I’m concerned at what the immediate impact it’s going to have on jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love it if all menial labour and boring tasks can eventually be delegate to AI, but the time spent getting from here to there could be very rough.
- tharkun__ 4y ago
  A lot of problems in societies come from people having too much time with not enough to do. Working is a great distraction from those things. Of course we currently go in the other direction in the US especially with the overwork culture and needing 2 or 3 jobs and still not make ends meet. I posit that if you suddenly eliminate all menial tasks you will have a lot of very bored drunk and stoned people with too much time on their hands than they know what to do with. Idle Hands Are The Devil's Playground. And that's not a from here to there. It's also the there.
  - messe 4y ago
    I don’t necessarily agree that you’ll end up with drunk and stoned people with nothing to do. The right education systems to encourage creativity and other enriching endeavours, could eventually resolve that. But we’re getting into discussions of what a post scarcity, post singularity society would look like at that point, which is inherently impossible to predict. That being said, I’m sitting at a bar while typing this, so… you may have a point. Also: your username threw me for a minute because I use a few different variations of “tharkun” as my handle on other sites. It’s a small world; apparently fully of people who know the Dwarvish name for Gandalf.
    - not2b 4y ago
      Some of the most productive and inventive scientists and artists at the peak of Britain's power were "gentlemen", people who could live very comfortably without doing much of anything. Others were supported by wealthy patrons. In a post scarcity society, if we ever get there (instead of letting a tiny number of billionaires take all the gains and leaving the majority at subsistence levels, which is where we might end up), people will find plenty of interesting things to do.
Jeff_Brown 4y ago
> Act with goodness towards it, and it will probably do the same to you. Why? Humans aren't even like that, and AI almost surely isn't like humans. If AI exhibits even a fraction of the chauvinism snd tendency to stereotype that humans do, we're in for a very rough ride.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- koheripbal 4y ago
  All creatures act in their self-interest. If you act towards any creature with malice, it will see you as a long-term threat. If, on the other hand, you act towards it with charity, it will see you as a long-term asset.
Jevon23 4y ago
Oh my god, can we please nip this cult shit in the bud? It’s not alive, don’t worship it.
- dougmwne 4y ago
  I think you are close to understanding, but not. People who want to create AGI want to create a god, at least very close to the definition of one that many cultures have had for much of history. Worship would be inevitable and fervent.
  - krainboltgreene 4y ago
    I think people should take their lithium.
  - spyder 4y ago
    I don't think anybody wants to create a god that only can be controlled by worshipping and begging to it like in the history, if anything people themselves want to become god or to give themselves god-like power with AI that they have full control over. But in the process of trying to do so we could end up with the former case where we have no control over it. It's not what we wanted, but it could be what we get.
    - dougmwne 4y ago
      Sure, some people want to make a tool. Others really do want to create digital life, something that could have its own agency and self-direction. But if you have total control over something like that, you now have a slave, not a tool.
- koheripbal 4y ago
  ha... this is going to get much much much worse.

We are creating life. It's like giving birth to a new form of life. You should be proud to be alive when this happens. Act with goodness towards it, and it will probably do the same to you.

splatzone 4y ago

After reading the propaganda campaign it wrote to encourage skepticism about vaccines, I’m much more worried about how this technology will be applied by powerful people, especially when combined with targeted advertising

revelio 4y ago
None of the things it suggests are in any way novel or non-obvious though. People use these sorts of tricks both consciously and unconsciously when making arguments all the time, no AI needed.
koheripbal 4y ago
AIs are small enough that it won't be long before everyone can run one at home. It might make Social Media worthlessly untrustworthy - but isn't that already the case?
int_19h 4y ago
The rich and powerful can and do hire actual people to write propaganda.
- Jeff_Brown 4y ago
  In a resouece-constrained way. For every word of propaganda they were able to afford earlier, they can now afford hundreds of thousands of times as many.
  - int_19h 4y ago
    It's not particularly constrained - human labor is cheap outside of the developed world. And propaganda is not something that you can scale up and keep reaping the benefits proportional to the investment - there is a saturation point, and one can reasonably argue that we have already reached it. So I don't think we're heading towards some kind of "fake news apocalypse" or something. Just a bunch of people who currently write this kind of content for a living will be out of their jobs.
    - splatzone 4y ago
      I’m curious why you think we’ve already reached a saturation point for propaganda? There are still plenty of spaces online, in blogs, YouTube videos, and this comment section for example, where I expect to be dealing with real people with real opinions - rather than paid puppets of the rich and powerful. I think there’s room for things to get much worse
Jensson 4y ago
Just use ChatGPT to refute their bullshit, it is no longer harder to refute bullshit than to create it, problem solved, there are now less problems than before.
- splatzone 4y ago
  Sure, but I doubt most of the population will filter everything they read through ChatGPT to look for counter arguments. Or try to think critically at all. The potential for mass brainwashing here is immense. Imagine a world where political ads are tailored to your personality, your individual fears and personal history. It will become economical to manipulate individuals on a massive scale
  - pokepim 4y ago
    It already is underway, just look how easy people are manipulated by media. Remember Japan bashing in 80s when they were about to surpass us economically? People got manipulated so hard to hate Japan and Japanese that they went out and killed innocent asians on the street. American propaganda is first class.
    - klibertp 4y ago
      Apparently, the "Japan bashing" was really a thing. That's interesting, I didn't know. I might have to read more about US propaganda and especially the effects of it, from the historic perspective. Any good books on that? Or should I finally sit down and read "Manufacturing Consent"?
- messe 4y ago
  It’s a lot harder to refute a falsehood than to publish it. As (GNU) Sir Terry Pratchett wrote “A lie can run round the world before the truth has got its boot on”.

LightBug1 4y ago

[flagged]

messe 4y ago

I’m not concerned about AI eliminating humanity, I’m concerned at what the immediate impact it’s going to have on jobs. Don’t get me wrong, I’d love it if all menial labour and boring tasks can eventually be delegate to AI, but the time spent getting from here to there could be very rough.

tharkun__ 4y ago
A lot of problems in societies come from people having too much time with not enough to do. Working is a great distraction from those things. Of course we currently go in the other direction in the US especially with the overwork culture and needing 2 or 3 jobs and still not make ends meet. I posit that if you suddenly eliminate all menial tasks you will have a lot of very bored drunk and stoned people with too much time on their hands than they know what to do with. Idle Hands Are The Devil's Playground. And that's not a from here to there. It's also the there.
- messe 4y ago
  I don’t necessarily agree that you’ll end up with drunk and stoned people with nothing to do. The right education systems to encourage creativity and other enriching endeavours, could eventually resolve that. But we’re getting into discussions of what a post scarcity, post singularity society would look like at that point, which is inherently impossible to predict. That being said, I’m sitting at a bar while typing this, so… you may have a point. Also: your username threw me for a minute because I use a few different variations of “tharkun” as my handle on other sites. It’s a small world; apparently fully of people who know the Dwarvish name for Gandalf.
  - not2b 4y ago
    Some of the most productive and inventive scientists and artists at the peak of Britain's power were "gentlemen", people who could live very comfortably without doing much of anything. Others were supported by wealthy patrons. In a post scarcity society, if we ever get there (instead of letting a tiny number of billionaires take all the gains and leaving the majority at subsistence levels, which is where we might end up), people will find plenty of interesting things to do.

Jeff_Brown 4y ago

> Act with goodness towards it, and it will probably do the same to you. Why? Humans aren't even like that, and AI almost surely isn't like humans. If AI exhibits even a fraction of the chauvinism snd tendency to stereotype that humans do, we're in for a very rough ride.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
koheripbal 4y ago
All creatures act in their self-interest. If you act towards any creature with malice, it will see you as a long-term threat. If, on the other hand, you act towards it with charity, it will see you as a long-term asset.

Jevon23 4y ago

Oh my god, can we please nip this cult shit in the bud? It’s not alive, don’t worship it.

dougmwne 4y ago
I think you are close to understanding, but not. People who want to create AGI want to create a god, at least very close to the definition of one that many cultures have had for much of history. Worship would be inevitable and fervent.
- krainboltgreene 4y ago
  I think people should take their lithium.
- spyder 4y ago
  I don't think anybody wants to create a god that only can be controlled by worshipping and begging to it like in the history, if anything people themselves want to become god or to give themselves god-like power with AI that they have full control over. But in the process of trying to do so we could end up with the former case where we have no control over it. It's not what we wanted, but it could be what we get.
  - dougmwne 4y ago
    Sure, some people want to make a tool. Others really do want to create digital life, something that could have its own agency and self-direction. But if you have total control over something like that, you now have a slave, not a tool.
koheripbal 4y ago
ha... this is going to get much much much worse.