3 ms·
> then the problem is not an LLM abusing it but anyone abusing it I think that's exactly right, but the point isn't that LLMs are going to go rogue (OK, maybe
by johnfn 4y ago
> then the problem is not an LLM abusing it but anyone abusing it
I think that's exactly right, but the point isn't that LLMs are going to go rogue (OK, maybe that's someone's point, but I don't think it's particularly likely just yet) so much as they will facilitate humans to go rogue at much higher rates. Presumably in a few years your grandma could get ChatGPT to start executing trades on the market.
- thisoneworks 4y agoWith great power comes great responsibility? Today there's nothing stopping grandmas from driving, so whatever could go wrong is already going wrong
- pixl97 4y agoYou don't understand the alignment problem.
- thisoneworks 4y agoOh I'm aware of it. I do not think it holds any merit right now when we're talking about coding assistants.
- johnfn 4y agoIt’s a problem of scale. If grandma could autonomously pilot a fleet of 500 cars we might be worried. Same thing if Joe Shmoe can spin up hundreds of instances of stock trading bots.
- thisoneworks 4y agoYou're better off placing your bet on Russian and Chinese hackers, crypto scammers than a Joe Shmoe. But read https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-llama-is-out-of-the-bag-should https://aisnakeoil.substack.com/p/the-llama-is-out-of-the-ba... - there's no noticeable rise in misinformation