That phrase is sticking out to me also. The framing "is the juice worth the squeeze" fits perfectly into the DEI's fundamental idea of how speech should work: t

That phrase is sticking out to me also. The framing "is the juice worth the squeeze" fits perfectly into the DEI's fundamental idea of how speech should work: the speaker must justify the value of his/her speech in order to have it. The flip-side is that there must be a justifiable reason to censor speech in order to silence it (with black-mask intimidation no less) regardless of its perceived value. Burden of proof that the juice is not worth the squeeze on the speaker vs the burden of proof that the speech should be silenced on the dean.