3 ms·
IMO you won't even need to build the app, you'll just provide a data model and some natural language descriptions of what you want your product to do.
by killthebuddha 4y ago
IMO you won't even need to build the app, you'll just provide a data model and some natural language descriptions of what you want your product to do.
- nprateem 4y agoExcept you won't if you want to make money because then you don't have a business
- Aeolos 4y agoAnd that is why some people think this AI leap could be as big as the internet.
- IanCal 4y agoUnless you charge for providing services of value to people.
- revelio 4y agoCharge people for installing your plugin into ChatGPT.
- killthebuddha 4y agoI mean yeah, you'll have to provide a data model (and data) that other people don't have.
- twobitshifter 4y agoThat’s how this plugin system works already.
- killthebuddha 4y agoI don't think this is the case. You provide an API spec but you also have to provide the implementation of that API. ChatGPT is basically a concierge between your API and the user.
- int_19h 4y agoI think the API is meant to be the data model in this scenario. The point is that you design the API around the task that it solves, rather than against whatever fixed spec OpenAI publishes. And then you tell ChatGPT, "here's an AI, make use of it for ..." - and it magically does, without you having to write any plumbing.
- killthebuddha 4y agoIt sounds like you might have it backwards. The API spec is published by you and the AI consumes it.
- int_19h 4y agoIt should read "here's an API", of course.
- hackerlight 4y agoIt isn't yet. For example, Wolfram Alpha is an app that GPT is communicating to, and it actually exists.