3 ms·

4 out of 5 are incorrect. What is astoundingly accurate about that? 1. It is not a false dilemma they really would burn you alive if you didn't do #2. 2. Ther

4 out of 5 are incorrect. What is astoundingly accurate about that? 1. It is not a false dilemma they really would burn you alive if you didn't do #2. 2. There is no circular reasoning, the conclusion isn't one of the premises. 3. Yeah, I would give it that. 4. There isn't enough info in the prompt to say it is "Hasty Generalization" or not. GPT is just making stuff up. 5. Same as 4, without seeing the evidence we don't know why the accusation of witchcraft occurred.

pessimizer 4y ago
No, they're all correct, the question is just bad. A dilemma isn't a logical fallacy, it's a situation. So when being asked what logical fallacies are being used against a suspected witch who has been handed this dilemma, you could only be speaking of the judicial process which put the accused witch there. Having been given no specific information about this witch and that process other than the dilemma posed by the trial, these five are some that may have come up during that process. edit: admittedly it's pretending to be sure these things happened, but asking the question implies there would be some basis on which to give a meaningful answer, although there isn't one.
pmarreck 4y ago
1. The fact that they are enforcing a false dilemma and refusing other options, does not stop it from being a false dilemma. 2. Yes it is. The conclusion that witchcraft exists is derived from the (actually still unproven) existence of witches. Which is also where the premise of the accusation comes from. Hence the circular reasoning. The more witches they burn, the more the reality of witchcraft becomes (in these minds), the more can be accused of it. 4. Maybe? There is almost certainly insufficient proof of anything the person has done proving "witchcraft", since witchcraft doesn't actually exist. These things were usually started by gossip (perhaps jealous housewives), anyway. 5- Yeah, fine, there was no other person mentioned, so this one is kinda weak, although the mere accusation of it "puts you in that group" so to speak
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]

pessimizer 4y ago

No, they're all correct, the question is just bad. A dilemma isn't a logical fallacy, it's a situation. So when being asked what logical fallacies are being used against a suspected witch who has been handed this dilemma, you could only be speaking of the judicial process which put the accused witch there. Having been given no specific information about this witch and that process other than the dilemma posed by the trial, these five are some that may have come up during that process. edit: admittedly it's pretending to be sure these things happened, but asking the question implies there would be some basis on which to give a meaningful answer, although there isn't one.

pmarreck 4y ago

1. The fact that they are enforcing a false dilemma and refusing other options, does not stop it from being a false dilemma. 2. Yes it is. The conclusion that witchcraft exists is derived from the (actually still unproven) existence of witches. Which is also where the premise of the accusation comes from. Hence the circular reasoning. The more witches they burn, the more the reality of witchcraft becomes (in these minds), the more can be accused of it. 4. Maybe? There is almost certainly insufficient proof of anything the person has done proving "witchcraft", since witchcraft doesn't actually exist. These things were usually started by gossip (perhaps jealous housewives), anyway. 5- Yeah, fine, there was no other person mentioned, so this one is kinda weak, although the mere accusation of it "puts you in that group" so to speak

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]