4 ms·

I agree with a lot of things in this article. My question is: If LLM can understand natural languages and convert them to a programming language, why not skip

by ericls 4y ago

I agree with a lot of things in this article. My question is: If LLM can understand natural languages and convert them to a programming language, why not skip the high level languages and go strait to machine code?

LesZedCB 4y ago
presumably for human verification purposes.
wsgeorge 4y ago
The programming language is an intermediary we humans and the machine can understand. It's better from an audit/explainability perspective.
- ericls 4y ago
  if the machine can already understand natural languages as shown by gpt, why can't it just let you code and debug in natural languages. Just curious? Like why can't it just throw compiler errors on your English code?
ThrowawayTestr 4y ago
It can do assembly, which is basically machine code.