3 ms·
This lazy way of interviewing is toast. The better way is take-home projects followed by a discussion. With GPT, those “3-4 hour” projects now become ~20 minute
by politician 4y ago
This lazy way of interviewing is toast. The better way is take-home projects followed by a discussion. With GPT, those “3-4 hour” projects now become ~20 minutes, and the follow up discussion is for validating that interviewer can trust the candidate to audit the results and take responsibility for getting it to work correctly.
I really loved what Steve said about software engineering being a field that exists because you can’t trust code.
- the_af 4y ago> This lazy way of interviewing is toast. The better way is take-home projects followed by a discussion. Agreed, this is what I'm thinking too. The "lazy" way is made obsolete by ChatGPT. And good riddance, frankly!