4 ms·
How is it ChatGPT 4 is like a few days old and people are reviewing its ability to "build complex systems with state of the art technologies" like they've been
by drstewart 4y ago
How is it ChatGPT 4 is like a few days old and people are reviewing its ability to "build complex systems with state of the art technologies" like they've been using it for years?
Reminds me of "Seeking developer with 10 years of experience in <brand new> framework"
- raincole 4y ago> How is it ChatGPT 4 is like a few days old and people are reviewing its ability to "build complex systems with state of the art technologies" like they've been using it for years? Why... why can't we reviewing its ability to "build complex system" because it's a few days old...? I'm pretty sure here "complex" is relative to what ChatGPT can do before, not relative to, say, what NASA did before. > Reminds me of "Seeking developer with 10 years of experience in <brand new> framework" AI is not human. The anthropomorphism is quite crazy here.
- drstewart 4y ago>AI is not human. The anthropomorphism is quite crazy here. You misunderstand. My point isn't that ChatGPT is the developer here, it's that ChatGPT is the "framework".