> Were it only about uncontrolled digital lending, the suit would have been tossed as moot two years ago. You don't think that publishers would have had any ca

> Were it only about uncontrolled digital lending, the suit would have been tossed as moot two years ago. You don't think that publishers would have had any case at all against deliberate mass-copyright infringement under flimsy pretences? I don't think "we stopped doing it when ordered to by a court" is much of a sign of good faith...