4 ms·
Wow. "K8s is simple", it has the same vibes as Linux user vs Dropbox: '...you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially by getting an FTP accoun
by zac23or 4y ago
Wow.
"K8s is simple", it has the same vibes as Linux user vs Dropbox:
'...you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially by getting an FTP account, mounting it locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem'
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8863
https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/25/google_kubernetes_autopilot/ https://www.theregister.com/2021/02/25/google_kubernetes_aut...
I love HN's disconnection from reality.
- cmeacham98 4y agoIt's not that Kubernetes is simple (it's not), but Kubernetes is relatively simple compared to the task it accomplishes. If you have containers that need to be scheduled and networked and supplied with storage and exposed to the internet across a large set of machines past the scale where you can easily do so with tools like docker-compose, Kubernetes (might) be for you. There's a good chance it will be simpler to understand and reason about than the homegrown kludge you could make to do the same thing, especially once you understand the core design around reconciliation loops. That said, you might not need all that, and then you probably shouldn't use Kubernetes.