4 ms·
Yes, this is verily what I objected to. It's called "semantics", similar to when people say "hair" everyone knows what that means. But sooner or later someone w
by stareatgoats 4y ago
Yes, this is verily what I objected to. It's called "semantics", similar to when people say "hair" everyone knows what that means. But sooner or later someone will point ut that this hair is different from that hair and if you split one hair, now what do we have? This process is always a possibility in any discourse, but largely frowned upon, rightly so.
- philipov 4y agoI think semantics is important :( In my experience, most arguments are the result of people not agreeing on what a word means.
- peoplefromibiza 4y agoMy opinion is that this it is not about semantics, it's about looking at the whole picture and not only to some specific outcome (running faster for example) Firstly, faster doesn't necessarily means better. Secondly, why do people run? Nobody can't say for sure in general. Why machines do it? (or would if they were able to) Because someone programmed them to do it. 100%. it makes all the difference in the World.
- pixl97 4y ago>Because someone programmed them to do it. 100%. It is this thinking of the past that will get large numbers of us in trouble with our future machines.