3 ms·
>I think the argument is more that they only work from past inputs, they interpret the world the way they are told to Arguably humans are the same, being the p
by RobotToaster 4y ago
>I think the argument is more that they only work from past inputs, they interpret the world the way they are told to
Arguably humans are the same, being the product of genetics, epigenetics, and lived experience.
- PaulDavisThe1st 4y agoAlmost certainly true, but there's a huge difference. We're the result of forces that have played out within an evolutionary process that has lasted for millions of years. Current "machine learning"-style AI (even when it uses self-driven iteration, like the game playing systems) is the result of a few ideas across not much more than 100 years, and for the most part is far too heavily influenced by existing human conceptions of what is possible and how to do things.