> I said it before, and I will say it again: If ChatGPT 3,4,5,... can take your job, maybe youre not really providing that much value. The thing you're missing

> I said it before, and I will say it again: If ChatGPT 3,4,5,... can take your job, maybe youre not really providing that much value. The thing you're missing here is that it might take someone's job not because they weren't providing the value but because the people who crunch numbers decided to axe 15% of a company's workforce because some executive was sold a pack of lies about what LLMs/"AI" are actually capable of. It's fine if that happens to one company who then finds out the hard way. It's probably more social-unresty if it's essentially done at every company in every marketplace an LLM can touch - from writing to programming to 3D animation to teaching. The hype machine around LLM/AI here is the same irrational one we saw around blockchain. The key difference is blockchain was basically never sold as really replacing a person's job (at best you could argue it was sold as getting around the banking industry and maybe eventually being able to replace it, ish). The primary sales pitch of these LLMs is essentially "do more with less".