3 ms·
There's a 150-page paper solely to describe instances of it doing that. It's the article attached to this comment thread.
by cjbprime 4y ago
There's a 150-page paper solely to describe instances of it doing that. It's the article attached to this comment thread.
- js8 4y agoWell, it's about the standard of the proof. When I say "demonstrate", I don't mean just experimentally, I mean theoretically, to show that the algorithm is capable of reasoning about potentially arbitrarily large instances of puzzles. That's what the experiments have shown - once the unknown instance gets large enough, the reasoning of LLM breaks down. This is not the case with humans, who can, as noted elsewhere, do a tree search, form hypotheses, etc.