4 ms·
Checking one at random: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HhV9iJxXTU9liAZPIDoMOZ93L48uZRnnT13G-lqI150/edit#gid=786971613 https://docs.google.com/spreadsh
by djoldman 4y ago
Checking one at random:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HhV9iJxXTU9liAZPIDoMOZ93L48uZRnnT13G-lqI150/edit#gid=786971613 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HhV9iJxXTU9liAZPIDoM...
...shows 0s in the first row for all candidate parties. But the corresponding photo shows votes for all three:
https://inec-cvr-cache.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/cached/results/2676/result_46011_1677492816_thumb.jpg https://inec-cvr-cache.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/cached/res...
I hope it's not a mistake and that there's some arcane law/technicality to explain it.
edit: another mistake on row 21, LP should get 25 but it was credited to NNPP:
https://docs.inecelectionresults.net/elections_prod/1292/state/1/lga/3120/ward/17712/pu/2707/2707-1677468711.pdf https://docs.inecelectionresults.net/elections_prod/1292/sta...
- dan-robertson 4y agoYeah looks weird. When I scrolled to a random part, the numbers seemed to line up. They didn’t say things were entirely correct though. Perhaps the data quality is sufficient for a challenge. Odd that the first rows seem more wrong though.