4 ms·
a document-based blockchain would curb publishers hard. the CDL is sadly a lousy way to implement lending, as it doesn't offer reassurance that people borrowing
by mintaka5 4y ago
a document-based blockchain would curb publishers hard. the CDL is sadly a lousy way to implement lending, as it doesn't offer reassurance that people borrowing documents aren't replicating them. everyone lost their minds making silly useless NFTs of shitty artwork, but did any of those "geniuses" in the dying publishing empire bother to implement any NFTs of their publications? no instead they bitched about libraries being the number one cause of their profit losses (which is an absolute LIE). the problem isn't lending books (in whatever medium) the problem is a lack of an effective brain trust in the upper echelons of industry to embrace tech and use it to innovate and prosper. there is no reason why books can't be woven into a blockchain, and then license the usage to libraries for lending. everyone wins!
- coldacid 4y agoI'm sure that being an NFT will prevent me from downloading the next monkey JPEG I come across.
- mintaka5 4y agocould you prove true ownership of that download?
- rasz 4y ago>doesn't offer reassurance that people borrowing documents aren't replicating them in contrast to the system libraries all over the world use to prevent paper books from being scanned/photographed
- anticensor 4y agoDoes that exist?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- 988747 4y ago[dead]
- mintaka5 4y agohave you ever scanned an entire book at the library? i love the effort here, but it seems an overly simplified comparison.