3 ms·
"... stuff that got financed five years ago, and probably has pretty decent loan to values given that the property values are in most cases up from where they w
by rsync 4y ago
"... stuff that got financed five years ago, and probably has pretty decent loan to values given that the property values are in most cases up from where they were 5 years ago."
Yes, that is the hope - and the narrative - but we're not talking about a minor correction here ... like a 10% haircut on building values. I suspect the current market for office space in SF is probably ~40% off and that's for class-A space.
"... but unless rents fell off a cliff, has a bit of runway to play out."
Rents have fallen off a cliff we're just pretending they haven't by refusing to lease the space at the prices the market would actually clear at. Building owners and management, etc., would rather have empty offices than establish new, lower rents by actually renting them.
If they did actually rent the space at the market clearing price they would all get margin calls from their banks because their loan to value (LTV) ratios would blow up and their loans have covenants specifically calling out the LTV.
This cannot last forever.
Eventually someone is going to rent space at the market rates and building owners in SF will either need to show up at their bank with a 5 or 10 million dollar check ... or with the keys to turn in.
- balderdash 4y agoI actually agree with you, but SF class A office isn’t representative of the commercial market that these banks lend into. A lot of these loans are for a strip mall in Wichita, a suburban office building in charlotte, an urgent care clinic in Iowa, etc.