5 ms·
That is pretty much the case, but I'm always taken back by how many people believe intelligence = directly replicating human thought. I thought the common conse
by waboremo 4y ago
That is pretty much the case, but I'm always taken back by how many people believe intelligence = directly replicating human thought. I thought the common consensus was instead that (artificial) intelligence was instead about mimicking enough of the process to provide the outcome. Largely because it's impossible to replicate something when we don't entirely know how it works. Major discoveries of basic aspects of the mind are still happening regularly.
- textninja 4y ago> Largely because it's impossible to replicate something when we don't entirely know how it works. On the contrary. These are mostly orthogonal.
- waboremo 4y agoHow do you believe they're orthogonal?
- textninja 4y agoBiological reproduction for one. Copy/paste for another. Biological reproduction is only tenuously related to understanding and copy/paste isn’t even related at all. We can copy around weights and biases all day without understanding them.
- waboremo 4y agoMakes sense, you've changed my mind a bit but only the part that consciously understands.