3 ms·

Can we agree that an "early (yet still incomplete) version of AGI" isn't AGI?

• ftxbro 4y ago
  To me it's clear that they think it's AGI, and that they think AGI is such a loaded concept that it's not worth "announcing" it. Beliefs are changing so fast right now. The term "AGI skeptic" will soon (if not already) mean "I don't trust AGIs in positions of authority or power" rather than "I don't think the technology is capable of matching our level of cognition."
  • famouswaffles 4y ago
    If you think AGI is artificial, and generally intelligent then yeah it's AGI 100% but some people have such loaded expectations of AGI that a significant chunk of the human population wouldn't even pass lol.
• dragonwriter 4y ago
  I hope we can agree that “not completely X” is “not X”.
  • coldtea 4y ago
    Why would we agree on that? Anything "not completely X" surely the attribute of aproaching Xness, else it would just be "not X".
  • pixl97 4y ago
    So if you get your finger cut off, or you go blind, you're not human any more?