The alternative I've suggested is rather different than the suggested alternatives of accepting results or taking them for granted. In another comment I said:

The alternative I've suggested is rather different than the suggested alternatives of accepting results or taking them for granted. In another comment I said: > I'd suggest reading every paper critically, realizing (as most people do) that the results are tentative, and either letting it go at that, or dig in and do the hard work to figure out what may be flawed in the work presented. Then work with the authors or publish a paper of one's own pointing out the flaw and the new resulting analysis.