> It should be good for the middle and low ends, but I expect pretty bad for the high-end of any given job type. The high end are doing good by definition. The

> It should be good for the middle and low ends, but I expect pretty bad for the high-end of any given job type. The high end are doing good by definition. The exceptionally talented are winning anyways, if they win a little less outlyingly they will still be winning. It's not as if this would be a project of "pay everybody exactly the same". Who might in theory consider this regulation a problem is companies who like to hire a mix of bottom of the barrel cheap and gold plated rockstars, but in reality those would already have separate roles for these opposites and are therefore not affected are all.