3 ms·
As a 2560x1440(or 1600) resolution monitor user, I think a 4K monitor would be fantastic. Yeah it would cost an arm and a leg, but cost aside I would use it in
by phamilton 15y ago
As a 2560x1440(or 1600) resolution monitor user, I think a 4K monitor would be fantastic. Yeah it would cost an arm and a leg, but cost aside I would use it in a heartbeat.
For anyone who has used 2 30 inch IPS screens at the same time, that's roughly the same total pixels as a 4k monitor.
I can easily keep that much space filled up and productive using a tiling window manager.
It would be a 44inch screen at the same resolution of Dell's 30inch IPS monitors.
- 178 15y agoI agree, but he is talking about Television sets. They are further away, thus you wouldn't see all those pixels (which is the Articles whole point). I used the same formula a few months back to calculate that on my bedroom TV i wouldn't even see the difference between SD and HD (27" TV, 2m away). These calculations are basicly the same Apple used to coin the term 'Retina Display'. By the same reasoning, my 560i CRT-TV is a 'Retina TV'.
- phamilton 15y agoTrue. I'm a blu ray fan, even on my 30 inch LCD. Resolution aside, I do find the picture to be clearer and the colors more vivid on a blu ray vs a dvd. It may be just due to cleaner compression / encoding, but there is a noticable difference.