4 ms·
Why was there no word about sharepoint? The true reason is that sharepoint - I mean the sites not the storage (ok the links that can‘t be changed) - is really
by esel2k 4y ago
Why was there no word about sharepoint?
The true reason is that sharepoint - I mean the sites not the storage (ok the links that can‘t be changed) - is really bad. I don’t know a single person that likes sharepoint sites.
We use notion for most of out information sharing and guidelines, faq and minutes.
I wonder why the article didn’t mention it would replace all sharepoint sites in the future.
- CharlesW 4y ago> The true reason is that sharepoint - I mean the sites not the storage (ok the links that can‘t be changed) - is really bad. I can understand why the typical HN reader would call SharePoint “bad”, but it’s honestly fine. In my experience it’s certainly no worse than, say, Confluence. (BTW, the trick for links that don’t change is to link to Document IDs. It’s pretty easy to learn how to enable them, and to create site collections.) > I wonder why the article didn’t mention it would replace all sharepoint sites in the future. Because it’s a “collaboration space” rather than a “publishing space”, my guess is that it’ll eventually replace Teams rather than SharePoint.
- cybrexalpha 4y ago> […] it’s certainly no worse than, say, Confluence. I don't think this is a great comparison, when Confluence is one of the worst tools I've ever had the displeasure of touching.