3 ms·
Maybe because Capistrano is written in Ruby and the language matches their internal products? That was my only guess.
by camsjams 4y ago
Maybe because Capistrano is written in Ruby and the language matches their internal products? That was my only guess.
- mbreese 4y agoI was guessing that they kept using Capistrano because it still worked. No need to change something that’s working… (Somewhat of an ironic comment when talking about an article about ditching K8s…)