4 ms·
Sounds like singleplayer games would be more your speed.
by bakugo 4y ago
Sounds like singleplayer games would be more your speed.
- the_af 4y agoSpeaking for myself: yes. The only multiplayer FPS I ever truly enjoyed was L4D, and only because it's cooperative (I did enjoy Versus mode, but coop is where it shined for me). The problem is that many military shooters don't (or didn't) have singleplayer, or what they did have was a simple demo for the MP mode. That sucks. I enjoyed the first iterations of the CoD and Modern Warfare titles because they were all about the singleplayer campaign, full of plot twists. I got tired eventually and no longer play any CoD or MW games, but that's a different issue. If you had very specific periods of time you were interested in, it was even worse. There was a time when there was absolutely no singleplayer 'Nam FPS, only Battlefield: Vietnam, which a- sucked, and b- was multiplayer.
- Insanity 4y agoMore than a decade later, and I'm still playing 1 game of l4d2 each weekend with the same people. It is such a great game. (We do play Versus). That said, many things make COD less fun to me today than in the past, but the root cause is not having dedicated servers. Running into the same people and actually having that sense of community is completely gone now.
- gadders 4y agoMostly? I like the Assassin's Creed games, Witcher 3, Far Cry etc. I'd probably play more multi-player games if I lasted more than 30s and didn't have to sit out the rest of the round. (Yeah, yeah "git gud" etc)