It's not the judgement about interests around a type of process, but the fundamental process itself: it leaves no "tooling marks." There is no way to see it was

It's not the judgement about interests around a type of process, but the fundamental process itself: it leaves no "tooling marks." There is no way to see it was "made by a human" or "made by an algorithm" because there is no metadata and no telltale marks left in the pure data of a string of text. Perhaps in a fit of reactionary over-regulation overreach and wishful half-measures, governments decide to make it a very serious crime to generate anything by AI without submitting a signature to a planetary repository of AI generated works. It won't work for obvious impractical, unenforceable, and spread of variations but it will make them feel like they've "tamed" a disruption when, like climate change, they've done absolutely nothing.