The problem is that the most common "personality test", the "Myers-Briggs" has nothing to do with "personality", let alone "toxic personality", so an argument a

The problem is that the most common "personality test", the "Myers-Briggs" has nothing to do with "personality", let alone "toxic personality", so an argument about "personality" is not an argument for that particular personality test. This is a bait-and-switch dishonest argument - the gap between them is exactly the problem. This is because the "Myers-Briggs" is hogwash, with as much predictive power of personality as astrology. i.e. none. If the people administering them are using them for the intended purpose, they're rejecting candidates on nothing more than a roll of the dice. If not, then as others suggest, they are covert way of "screening for neurodivergent people"" So: This _personality test_ can fuck right off. I doubt that any other quick multiple choice questionnaires are much better. If anyone wants to claim that they're worth anything, show the proof please. https://www.vice.com/en/article/bjv8y5/the-myers-briggs-personality-test-bullshit https://www.vice.com/en/article/bjv8y5/the-myers-briggs-pers... https://amanda-obryan.medium.com/9-reasons-the-myers-briggs-personality-test-is-trash-and-companies-should-never-use-it-again-5fc95eac6d02 https://amanda-obryan.medium.com/9-reasons-the-myers-briggs-... https://www.businessinsider.com/most-personality-tests-junk-science-make-you-cling-to-label-2020-7?r=US&IR=T https://www.businessinsider.com/most-personality-tests-junk-...