3 ms·
I am guessing that at some point a class of programming languages will be designed that is both optimal to generate by LLMs and easy to read/understand for huma
by eterps 4y ago
I am guessing that at some point a class of programming languages will be designed that is both optimal to generate by LLMs and easy to read/understand for humans. Right now most PLs are optimized for writing code by humans.
- gwoolhurme 4y agoThat is what makes them also optimal for LLMs as is. It would be more efficient to have something that is direct machine code, but LLMs are Large <Language> Models right?
- AlexandrB 4y ago> easy to read/understand for humans I think many languages are actually already optimized for this. Where "reading" means reasoning about what the program does and not just reading text.
- brookst 4y agoDo we even need such a language, beyond just English / other human languages? IMO we’ll see LLM interpreters / compilers where the spec is the code, and whatever the LLM does in the background is opaque to the “programmer”.