3 ms·
Its isn't evidence against, but it is evidence that panspermia is less necessary than previously thought. Should we detect life out there somewhere, the fact t
by sandworm101 4y ago
Its isn't evidence against, but it is evidence that panspermia is less necessary than previously thought. Should we detect life out there somewhere, the fact that these compounds are more universal decreased the likelihood that that detected life is related to us through panspermia. The fact that life in two places uses RNA no longer means that it must be directly related to the RNA/DNA-based life on earth.
- ianai 4y agoWay too early in the science needed to characterize as evidence for or against panspermia or much else. We need much much more work like this.
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago> too early in the science needed to characterize as evidence for or against panspermia or much else Every organic compound that spontaneously develops under natural conditions is an argument against the necessity of panspermia.