4 ms·
ah, very nice, it is easy. The chaining is still fairly clunky though, although maybe comparing it to haskell's do notation syntactic sugar is unfair. (isn't t
by freshhawk 15y ago
ah, very nice, it is easy. The chaining is still fairly clunky though, although maybe comparing it to haskell's do notation syntactic sugar is unfair.
(isn't the opposite direction the feature of doing things this way? That you can't call monadic code from pure code is a good thing)