3 ms·
Part of this is due to fraud from the last couple of years. I know multiple companies who dealt with remote employee fraud over the last 2 years. Companies are
by brightball 4y ago
Part of this is due to fraud from the last couple of years. I know multiple companies who dealt with remote employee fraud over the last 2 years. Companies are defensive now.
- grugagag 4y agoWhat kind of fraud in remote work?
- IceyEC 4y agoI interview and then you show up to do the job, possibly
- coredog64 4y agoI saw a lot of that while doing phone screens: People who were getting coached via earbuds, people who were frantically searching Google for answers, etc. The 100% virtual hiring process means that it is much easier to sub out your interview as there’s no point in the process where you show up for an on-site, present your government issued ID, and then interview.
- dilyevsky 4y agoI don’t remember ever showing my id in onsites. In some of those big places one could def skate by having someone else interview and then show up on first day and nobody would notice. Ime id doesn’t come up until hr wants work authorization on your first day
- pnutjam 4y agoYeah, I worked for a large employer who complained about this happening when people were onsite all day. Different people interviewed and showed up for work. This is nothing new, it's just a media blitz by status quo lovers.
- Arch-TK 4y agoThere were a few articles about people getting multiple remote jobs, doing the bare minimum to avoid getting fired for a while, eventually getting fired, and accruing large sums of money by doing that for years while presumably also holding a normal job in secret.
- whateveracct 4y agoIs that fraud though?
- andsoitis 4y agoI would say so. Fraud is when you intentionally deceive someone for gain. Whether the particular fraud is criminal or not is a separate matter.
- whateveracct 4y agoI think it's potentially more complicated than that. If an employer asks you if you have another job and you are working a second one, it is lying for you to say that you don't. But what exclusive right does your employer have to your labor? That depends on your contract of course. So if you signed away exclusive access to your labor, it's fraud. And that's not uncommon - there's often at least a "you will disclose other employment" clause in developer at-will contracts. That said, I think the only consequence of not disclosing is potentially getting fired with cause if you get found out. IANAL but I don't know of precedent for clawing back pay (which would be fitting for actual fraud). If you didn't, then it's your employer trying to get more than they signed. And in that case, the lie is a necessary evil.
- ryandrake 4y agoYou know, when a working class dude busts his ass taking two, or even three jobs to improve his family's living standard, he's admired and they call him hard working. But when an office worker manages to slice up his day such that he can take two jobs (and do them up to performance expectations) they call it fraud. Not sure I understand this double standard. People get so hung up on this idea that full time should imply exclusive.
- brightball 4y agoPersonal favorite was refusal to turn on cameras while a different voice participated in each conversation, if at all. There was always a different reason why the camera couldn't be turned on too, while it clearly wasn't a problem during the interview. Tracked IP address access and it was hopping all over the world on a day to day basis. Constantly acting confused after acing the interview. Never getting anything done and insisting on pairing with somebody else who just did the work for them. Essentially the goal seemed to be to collect a paycheck for as long as possible until somebody noticed and you ended up fired. I heard variations of this from a few people and saw one first hand.