5 ms·
You have to provide more context, so that it has something to bridge in the high dimensional space. > The Byzantine Generals Problem is a more difficult proble
by nerpderp82 4y ago
You have to provide more context, so that it has something to bridge in the high dimensional space.
> The Byzantine Generals Problem is a more difficult problem than the Two Generals Problem because it requires a consensus algorithm that can tolerate the presence of faulty actors. There are many solutions to the Byzantine Generals Problem, including Byzantine Fault Tolerance, which is a common technique used in distributed systems to ensure that the system can continue to operate correctly even in the presence of faulty actors.
One can't jump over a chasm, you have to literately bridge from the known to the unknown.
https://privatebin.net/?45ed3f39de71f289#eyiwC81q93MtfpimZBHHKv3jaBudYJLSrGbyss8zqgg https://privatebin.net/?45ed3f39de71f289#eyiwC81q93MtfpimZBH...
- kedean 4y agoYou're supporting their point. You can't go to ChatGPT for knowledge you don't already have because it will confidently spout garbage, which is what was being suggested "whats new in java X". If you can build that bridge yourself then you aren't asking it for knowledge, you're asking it to format things for you.
- nerpderp82 4y agoI disagree, I use it all the time for things I don't know about. I then feed those discoveries into semanticscholar, scholar.google.com, wikipeida, libgen.is, etc. I then ask it so summarize and ELI15. If ChatGPT is feeding you bogus knowledge then you are already consuming bogus knowledge over your existing channels. If you aren't including feedback into your understanding you are recording, not learning.