Skepticism regarding a claim of harm in a specific circumstance does not constitute support of the behavior described. You’re pissed off by your interpretation

Skepticism regarding a claim of harm in a specific circumstance does not constitute support of the behavior described. You’re pissed off by your interpretation of what he “meant” instead of what he actually wrote. This is the case for nearly every single person I’ve seen slandering him in this fashion. Frankly I wish he’d sue all of you into destitution.