3 ms·

Thank you!! Why on earth isn't that the default. It always seemed weird that with multiple bash windows open, the commands from most of them weren't added to th

Thank you!! Why on earth isn't that the default. It always seemed weird that with multiple bash windows open, the commands from most of them weren't added to the history.

noxvilleza 4y ago
My guesses are that it's on-close so you can follow the per-shell history slightly easier (rather than it being interleaved from multiple shells?), or reducing disk writes?
- bombcar 4y ago
  They don’t interlace which can be nice
dtgriscom 4y ago
I often have three or more terminals open, doing different tasks in each; I also often have cycles of work where I'll repeat the last three commands again (three up-arrows and a return). This breaks if one terminal's commands get inserted into another terminal's history.
- aidenn0 4y ago
  My solution is I immediately record the commands, but do not load them. That way new terminals get all the history, but old terminals keep their flow.
  - geysersam 4y ago
    But if you go back later, the chains of commands from different terminals are interlaced right?
    - aidenn0 4y ago
      To some degree; it depends on the amount of multitasking. I mainly care about which commands in which order when I'm looking at recent commands from that terminal; otherwise I use C-r.
- flyaway123 4y ago
  Comment from the author: "Ted, the change I suggest doesn't affect the independence of your sessions as you suggest. Each shell maintains a unique history in memory so modifying the history file has no affect on running terminals. The only time the history file is read is when you start a new terminal. I recommend you try my suggestion. Really, all I am doing is eliminating the race condition that causes the bash history file to have inconsistent data. Thanks for the feedback."
  - cstrahan 4y ago
    Exactly this. If you do want to load the history persisted from other shells into the current one, all you have to do (if memory serves) is: $ history -r
usefulcat 4y ago
It is very useful just be careful when switching between shells and hitting the up arrow to get the previous command, as you may get something from another shell.
- mkl 4y ago
  That will only happen if PROMPT_COMMAND also contains "history -c; history -r", right? "history -a" just saves it, but "history -c; history -r" clears memory history and reloads from disk.
  - usefulcat 4y ago
    Yes, that's correct. I overlooked that detail while reading the link on a phone, where the text is quite small.

Thank you!! Why on earth isn't that the default. It always seemed weird that with multiple bash windows open, the commands from most of them weren't added to the history.

noxvilleza 4y ago

My guesses are that it's on-close so you can follow the per-shell history slightly easier (rather than it being interleaved from multiple shells?), or reducing disk writes?

bombcar 4y ago
They don’t interlace which can be nice

dtgriscom 4y ago

I often have three or more terminals open, doing different tasks in each; I also often have cycles of work where I'll repeat the last three commands again (three up-arrows and a return). This breaks if one terminal's commands get inserted into another terminal's history.

aidenn0 4y ago
My solution is I immediately record the commands, but do not load them. That way new terminals get all the history, but old terminals keep their flow.
- geysersam 4y ago
  But if you go back later, the chains of commands from different terminals are interlaced right?
  - aidenn0 4y ago
    To some degree; it depends on the amount of multitasking. I mainly care about which commands in which order when I'm looking at recent commands from that terminal; otherwise I use C-r.
flyaway123 4y ago
Comment from the author: "Ted, the change I suggest doesn't affect the independence of your sessions as you suggest. Each shell maintains a unique history in memory so modifying the history file has no affect on running terminals. The only time the history file is read is when you start a new terminal. I recommend you try my suggestion. Really, all I am doing is eliminating the race condition that causes the bash history file to have inconsistent data. Thanks for the feedback."
- cstrahan 4y ago
  Exactly this. If you do want to load the history persisted from other shells into the current one, all you have to do (if memory serves) is: $ history -r

usefulcat 4y ago

It is very useful just be careful when switching between shells and hitting the up arrow to get the previous command, as you may get something from another shell.

mkl 4y ago
That will only happen if PROMPT_COMMAND also contains "history -c; history -r", right? "history -a" just saves it, but "history -c; history -r" clears memory history and reloads from disk.
- usefulcat 4y ago
  Yes, that's correct. I overlooked that detail while reading the link on a phone, where the text is quite small.