It's funny because I was searching on Bing Chat earlier today and came across a linux command <(). I enquired about it, and it then referenced an article. At

It's funny because I was searching on Bing Chat earlier today and came across a linux command <(). I enquired about it, and it then referenced an article. At the bottom of the article was something along the lines of "This content was generated with ChatGPT.". It made me think, if people stop thinking for themselves and start making articles which contain slight errors, those errors will become pervasive, and then these AI's could enter a loop where they generate confidently sounding incorrect information. It'll then make sense to weight information sources - but then who is in charge of deciding what weights to give what sources? I guess in the end where we get our "facts" will be decided by our "Benevolent AI Dictator Overlords".