4 ms·
As far as I know there are no religions or legal systems that posit that there are any rights inherently given to machines.
by egypturnash 4y ago
As far as I know there are no religions or legal systems that posit that there are any rights inherently given to machines.
- dymk 4y agoThe rights are exercised by the humans building and operating the machines. You're saying the hammer doesn't have rights. Well, yeah, duh. It's the person holding it.
- egypturnash 4y ago"so the legal basis for neural nets learning from other art is that it's learning like a human and creating new art from just knowing what art human think is good and optimizing its creation of art to mimic if not borrow the same qualities while still making something new" sure sounds like it's attributing the rights to the machine, not the person using it, to me.
- celdon25 4y agoNot for lack of trying though. https://transhumanist-party.org/tbr-3/ https://transhumanist-party.org/tbr-3/