"access to a multitude of voices" You mean a multitude of groupthinked, editor supervised voices? More people != better opinions unless there is a constant deb

"access to a multitude of voices" You mean a multitude of groupthinked, editor supervised voices? More people != better opinions unless there is a constant debate. And the modern subscription driven model for large newspapers means appealing to the base, and neutrality is bad for revenue. Substackers also have to appeal to their base. But individual idiosyncrasies and strong opinions are much better preserved when its just one person, instead of a n editor enforcing a hivemind.