4 ms·
But these stock image artists provided consent when signing a contract and selling their work to Adobe. The contract is pretty clear that you basically don't ow
by jonahrd 4y ago
But these stock image artists provided consent when signing a contract and selling their work to Adobe. The contract is pretty clear that you basically don't own the work anymore and Adobe can do whatever they want with it.
If you don't like it, don't sign the contract.
- spoiler 4y agoOh right, sorry. I was talking generally, not specifically to Firefly. Yeah, I think Adobe is a publisher and as such, you give it distribution rights. So, I agree with you on this case. Slightly tangential, but Imagine a singer or actor's voice of face being used without their consent just because the publisher has rights to distribute their performance. That probably wouldn't fly very well, and I assume this doesn't fly with some artists either (even though they signed a contract). I assume publishers will probably have an AI consent form soon. It's all very exciting, and I hope we don't ruin it with greed and disregard for the works of the very people that made these technologies so successful. Like, if it weren't for the scraped works, the AI feats would've been both much more underwhelming and and much more expensive to train.