5 ms·

I’m more inclined to call it the Age of Disinformation

extheat 4y ago
Can you elaborate why you think this is the most notable feature as opposed to others?
WhereIsTheTruth 4y ago
That's indeed what i'd call it too AI was already a thing with robotics / games What's being promoted these days are AI assisted generative tools, i personally call it "AI assisted copy pasta"
- asdff 4y ago
  They already had an ai assisted complete in gmail. I wonder how many managers operated by just hitting tab tab tab send and not writing any english at all the last few years?
samstave 4y ago
Why do you think this is coming from "GatesNotes" This guy needs to GTFO out of Humanity at this point. ANYTHING this guy says about AI is ging to be because he is going to fund AI-Malevolence-Protection-Racket then sell some pre-planned AI-cyber-storm solution that every computer on the planet will be mandated on installing.
finikytou 4y ago
open AI is the continuation of the liberal, neo democrat agenda. I thought we were in the age of disinformation with medias, social networks and censorship those past few years and thought with a slight relief that Elon Musk buying twitter would be the end of an era and that mankind will be brought back to a safe space where debates are seen as enriching, divergence of opinion as a strength but boy was I wrong. it was just the last sign of an old world trying to fight against a demon of smoke, revealing to all of us a new woke world where AI are agents of disinformation that will shape mankind through the woke agenda of the 1% for the good of no one but them. truly evil. and all the people praising what chatgpt can do will be the first one to tell us that they warned us back then.
LouisSayers 4y ago
It's funny because I was searching on Bing Chat earlier today and came across a linux command <(). I enquired about it, and it then referenced an article. At the bottom of the article was something along the lines of "This content was generated with ChatGPT.". It made me think, if people stop thinking for themselves and start making articles which contain slight errors, those errors will become pervasive, and then these AI's could enter a loop where they generate confidently sounding incorrect information. It'll then make sense to weight information sources - but then who is in charge of deciding what weights to give what sources? I guess in the end where we get our "facts" will be decided by our "Benevolent AI Dictator Overlords".

Can you elaborate why you think this is the most notable feature as opposed to others?

That's indeed what i'd call it too AI was already a thing with robotics / games What's being promoted these days are AI assisted generative tools, i personally call it "AI assisted copy pasta"

asdff 4y ago
They already had an ai assisted complete in gmail. I wonder how many managers operated by just hitting tab tab tab send and not writing any english at all the last few years?

samstave 4y ago

Why do you think this is coming from "GatesNotes" This guy needs to GTFO out of Humanity at this point. ANYTHING this guy says about AI is ging to be because he is going to fund AI-Malevolence-Protection-Racket then sell some pre-planned AI-cyber-storm solution that every computer on the planet will be mandated on installing.

finikytou 4y ago

open AI is the continuation of the liberal, neo democrat agenda. I thought we were in the age of disinformation with medias, social networks and censorship those past few years and thought with a slight relief that Elon Musk buying twitter would be the end of an era and that mankind will be brought back to a safe space where debates are seen as enriching, divergence of opinion as a strength but boy was I wrong. it was just the last sign of an old world trying to fight against a demon of smoke, revealing to all of us a new woke world where AI are agents of disinformation that will shape mankind through the woke agenda of the 1% for the good of no one but them. truly evil. and all the people praising what chatgpt can do will be the first one to tell us that they warned us back then.

LouisSayers 4y ago

It's funny because I was searching on Bing Chat earlier today and came across a linux command <(). I enquired about it, and it then referenced an article. At the bottom of the article was something along the lines of "This content was generated with ChatGPT.". It made me think, if people stop thinking for themselves and start making articles which contain slight errors, those errors will become pervasive, and then these AI's could enter a loop where they generate confidently sounding incorrect information. It'll then make sense to weight information sources - but then who is in charge of deciding what weights to give what sources? I guess in the end where we get our "facts" will be decided by our "Benevolent AI Dictator Overlords".