3 ms·
The reasons are extremely clear here, secondly, judges issue warrants based on facts, it's not perfect, but most warrants are obtained 100% legally. In this ca
by bastardoperator 4y ago
The reasons are extremely clear here, secondly, judges issue warrants based on facts, it's not perfect, but most warrants are obtained 100% legally.
In this case the accused had top secret document on his computer but more importantly is being investigated for images of child sexual abuse which was redacted by Rolling Stone.
You have to read the article, otherwise I would think you're defending an accused pedophile just because you have some imaginary beef with the FBI.
- superkuh 4y ago>otherwise I would think you're defending an accused pedophile just because you have some imaginary beef with the FBI. You're on the right track but you have it backwards. We should be mad that the FBI has so consistently degraded their reputation with parallel construction and other flat out lies that even in the case of a potentially heinous guilty person we cannot believe their claims before they are tested in court and the evidence, and evidentiary chain, is shown. So yeah, I'm defending anyone who has rocked the boat and then suddenly been raided by the FBI for an unrelated reason during which they happen to find something related to the rocking the boat. I find it just as likely that the FBI used their access to plant evidence for parallel construction in the Dropbox account and iPhone 8 conversation log. So they could search for national security stuff.
- bastardoperator 4y agoI see a lot of police making mistakes on youtube. Do I assume every police officer is a bad apple? No, because I'm not an idiot.