3 ms·
Shouldn't this be up to UBS?
by paddw 4y ago
Shouldn't this be up to UBS?
- k8sToGo 4y agoNo because CS already got $50B help before the acquisition
- bertil 4y agoI’m assuming that UBS has less agency to do it: if they do, they might run aground with the employment contracts. A government might have the authority to override those.
- fsckboy 4y agomaybe/probably UBS said to the govt, "we'll take this bank over if you cancel all these payouts as part of the deal" frequently in acquisitions/mergers/spinoffs, all the bad news is delivered before the deal so the new management can start fresh, and blame anything before on their predecessors.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]