They don't claim to have video of him engaging in the conversation, but they do claim to have a pretty damning picture of him. To support the idea that it was

They don't claim to have video of him engaging in the conversation, but they do claim to have a pretty damning picture of him. To support the idea that it was he who engaged in these messages, they claim that you can only be logged in to kik on one device at a time and have evidence that he was using the device for other purposes around the same time and in the same location as kik for at least one of these conversations. That's my reading, anyways. Not a lawyer and have trouble with the stilted language in these kinds of things.