4 ms·
I hate limitations as much as the next person, but these tools are viewed as generators by company xyz. You don’t want Disney to sue Adobe because the tool can
by HeavyFeather 4y ago
I hate limitations as much as the next person, but these tools are viewed as generators by company xyz. You don’t want Disney to sue Adobe because the tool can circumvent IP and abuse it.
“Draw a Disney logo but for adults”
That image now lives on Adobe.com
- dragonwriter 4y ago> You don’t want Disney to sue Adobe No, you don’t want Disney to sue Adobe.
- dragonwriter 4y agoSo, the above was somewhat flip and terse, but the kind of lawsuit being avoided is also the kind of thing that provides clarity on legal issues and removes spaces of doubt. This can be broadly beneficial. Giants battling it out can result in a clearer environment for everyone else that couldn’t afford legal risk in an environment of doubt.
- airstrike 4y agoWhat if I draw the logo with a regular 2B pencil? I want to see Disney sue Faber-Castell for making great pencils I used for my deviant art Also IANAL but even then there's probably fair use rights in parodying their logo
- HeavyFeather 4y agoDoes your art live on Adobe.com? I tried to make this clear. Currently “who made it” isn’t as clear as for paper and pencil. AI isn’t a seen as a plain tool yet, it’s part of the artist.