3 ms·
It is open-source, no question. What you might mean is that it isn't free/libre as in FOSS.
by akvadrako 4y ago
It is open-source, no question.
What you might mean is that it isn't free/libre as in FOSS.
- codetrotter 4y agoThat’s the Stallman kind of point of view. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source section "Open" versus "free" versus "free and open" But to a lot of us, “open source” has a specific meaning as well. > Open source doesn’t just mean access to the source code. https://opensource.org/osd/ https://opensource.org/osd/
- exelib 4y agoFrom my point of view, for example, GPL is not "open" at all. And yet it is on the list. In my opinion, BSL is even more "open" than GPL. Feel free to have a different view.