3 ms·
Read the thread. The implication was that non-GC languages leads to memory leaks. Rust was then presented as an option that isn't worse than a GC language in t
by tjoff 4y ago
Read the thread. The implication was that non-GC languages leads to memory leaks.
Rust was then presented as an option that isn't worse than a GC language in that regard.
Countering that with "Rust doesn't attempt to guarantee no memory leaks." is just silly...
- anonymoushn 4y agoI read it. What problem is Rust claimed not to have, which C and C++ have? Which GC language makes no attempt to collect unreachable reference cycles, so that Rust is no worse?