4 ms·
You know, we don't have to release an AI that obsoletes a large number of people and creates previously unseen levels of unemployment and social unrest.
by booleandilemma 4y ago
You know, we don't have to release an AI that obsoletes a large number of people and creates previously unseen levels of unemployment and social unrest.
- baal80spam 4y agoIf you (Company A/USA) doesn't release it, then someone else (Company B/China) will.
- so-and-so 4y agoOr maybe China's government wouldn't want to create a ton of unemployed ppl
- dymk 4y agoIt only needs to be released by one entity. Better to figure out what to do when it inevitably arrives, rather than trying (and failing) to avoid the eventuality.
- kderbyma 4y agonot true.
- marginalia_nu 4y agoI'm not sure this actually follows.
- UK-AL 4y agoYou shouldn't perform work that is unneeded. It's a problem for politicians on how people should earn living after that.
- aprinsen 4y ago"good luck paying your mortgage until this gets figured out"
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Nasrudith 4y agoSo right, ban earth movers and force the creation of a large ditch digging underclass then, if toil is ab unalloyed good. Huh, no takers then?