4 ms·

so far it's no where "good enough" though

by singularity2001 4y ago

kthejoker2 4y ago
ChatGPT also isn't good enough for ... almost anything, but here we are. Might as well make it cheap and easily portable and fine tunable
- reilly3000 4y ago
  If it wasn't against their TOS, ChatGPT is a great tool to help build ChatGPT.
  - gkbrk 4y ago
    It's not a meaningful restriction. Even if they were good at catching accounts doing this, the community that wants an open-source chat assistant is so huge that you could easily find many people to share their API keys or install a browser extension to share their chats.
    - denzil 4y ago
      Even that is not needed. There is enough people that want open source ChatGPT clone to create the dataset from scratch by themselves. The Open Assistant community actually already created enough training data for the initial model training and the data will be released under open source license. And from what I played with the initial model, it looked promising (though not anywhere close to GPT 3.5 yet).
- zer00eyz 4y ago
  I think that last part is what the "product" is. Train it with a large data set, learn to constrain it, and give it a more fixed scope AKA customer support. Retain the best of your existing staff to monitor, review and train it in an ongoing way. Use them to deal with "outliers" and "new features". People may loose jobs... but do companies want this? Can you imagine where google/fb/twitter/insert company name here no longer being able to hide behind "No one can reach a human"....
alex_sf 4y ago
It's been a week. The first instruction tuned versions of the 7b model came out 48 hours ago. Be patient.
- wkat4242 4y ago
  Have you seen any of the 65B yet? I think this will make it a lot more useful. I haven't seen any but the news is going so quickly now lol
wkat4242 4y ago
It would be a lot better if you could use the alpaca modifications on the 65B LLaMa model :(

4 ms·

so far it's no where "good enough" though

by singularity2001 4y ago

so far it's no where "good enough" though

kthejoker2 4y ago
ChatGPT also isn't good enough for ... almost anything, but here we are. Might as well make it cheap and easily portable and fine tunable
- reilly3000 4y ago
  If it wasn't against their TOS, ChatGPT is a great tool to help build ChatGPT.
  - gkbrk 4y ago
    It's not a meaningful restriction. Even if they were good at catching accounts doing this, the community that wants an open-source chat assistant is so huge that you could easily find many people to share their API keys or install a browser extension to share their chats.
    - denzil 4y ago
      Even that is not needed. There is enough people that want open source ChatGPT clone to create the dataset from scratch by themselves. The Open Assistant community actually already created enough training data for the initial model training and the data will be released under open source license. And from what I played with the initial model, it looked promising (though not anywhere close to GPT 3.5 yet).
- zer00eyz 4y ago
  I think that last part is what the "product" is. Train it with a large data set, learn to constrain it, and give it a more fixed scope AKA customer support. Retain the best of your existing staff to monitor, review and train it in an ongoing way. Use them to deal with "outliers" and "new features". People may loose jobs... but do companies want this? Can you imagine where google/fb/twitter/insert company name here no longer being able to hide behind "No one can reach a human"....
alex_sf 4y ago
It's been a week. The first instruction tuned versions of the 7b model came out 48 hours ago. Be patient.
- wkat4242 4y ago
  Have you seen any of the 65B yet? I think this will make it a lot more useful. I haven't seen any but the news is going so quickly now lol
wkat4242 4y ago
It would be a lot better if you could use the alpaca modifications on the 65B LLaMa model :(