4 ms·

Too expensive for something with no previews or samples. Interesting idea but I wish there was more to demonstrate the results before purchasing. If I was ded

by naet 4y ago

Too expensive for something with no previews or samples. Interesting idea but I wish there was more to demonstrate the results before purchasing. If I was dedicated I think there are some free solutions for training a model on your own face out there but you might have an edge in convenience. Ten dollars seems too steep for that though.

peteralaoui 4y ago
Thanks, interesting because I thought that the styles pictures (available after clicking on the call to action) would serve as samples but I guess I should put them on the homepage directly. I will try that tomorrow (European timezone ^^)
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- smortaz 4y ago
  yes definitely home page. it’s the first thing i looked for, didn’t immediately see, hit the back button. i would also consider a trial pic for free tied to email.
- angry_moose 4y ago
  My problem with it is you only show results for 2 people, for which a solid ~third of the "real life" ones look kinda bad (not even getting into the animated versions). It reads to me like you cherrypicked the two best examples and even those aren't great, whether that's true or not. Edit: Woof, I didn't realize you could get bigger versions of the examples. They were mostly fine as thumbnails but blown up to ~500x500 the the eyes and mouth are rough.
  - precompute 4y ago
    >They were mostly fine as thumbnails but blown up to ~500x500 the the eyes and mouth are rough. That's the result of automated training. If you want good results you need to properly label your dataset (15 or more images of yourself) and then use a proper upscaling solution for it. Dreambooth-based images usually need some manual fine-tuning (and sometimes inpainting) to look presentable at higher resolutions. You can use latent upscaling for adding details but it'd require some manual supervision to weed out the bad generations. Using upscalers like Lanczos is usually foolproof.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- naet 4y ago
  I think if you showed a full example (including the 15 inputs and the outputs) it would be more clear what I might be able to expect.
TheObviousOne 4y ago
[dead]
- nativespecies 4y ago
  Why not let people see all the results for free and watermark them? Then you can purchase only the ones you like?
  - 0x0000000 4y ago
    Because they'll just use another AI tool to remove the watermark.

by naet 4y ago

peteralaoui 4y ago

Thanks, interesting because I thought that the styles pictures (available after clicking on the call to action) would serve as samples but I guess I should put them on the homepage directly. I will try that tomorrow (European timezone ^^)

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
smortaz 4y ago
yes definitely home page. it’s the first thing i looked for, didn’t immediately see, hit the back button. i would also consider a trial pic for free tied to email.
angry_moose 4y ago
My problem with it is you only show results for 2 people, for which a solid ~third of the "real life" ones look kinda bad (not even getting into the animated versions). It reads to me like you cherrypicked the two best examples and even those aren't great, whether that's true or not. Edit: Woof, I didn't realize you could get bigger versions of the examples. They were mostly fine as thumbnails but blown up to ~500x500 the the eyes and mouth are rough.
- precompute 4y ago
  >They were mostly fine as thumbnails but blown up to ~500x500 the the eyes and mouth are rough. That's the result of automated training. If you want good results you need to properly label your dataset (15 or more images of yourself) and then use a proper upscaling solution for it. Dreambooth-based images usually need some manual fine-tuning (and sometimes inpainting) to look presentable at higher resolutions. You can use latent upscaling for adding details but it'd require some manual supervision to weed out the bad generations. Using upscalers like Lanczos is usually foolproof.
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
naet 4y ago
I think if you showed a full example (including the 15 inputs and the outputs) it would be more clear what I might be able to expect.

TheObviousOne 4y ago

[dead]

nativespecies 4y ago
Why not let people see all the results for free and watermark them? Then you can purchase only the ones you like?
- 0x0000000 4y ago
  Because they'll just use another AI tool to remove the watermark.