4 ms·
How reliable has it been for you? After struggling with langchain & GPT4 I was planning to try your lib next before maybe writing my own - I plan to make a supe
by bestcoder69 4y ago
How reliable has it been for you? After struggling with langchain & GPT4 I was planning to try your lib next before maybe writing my own - I plan to make a super generalized version so that my bot can code itself, so might have to pull out some tricks. (Before I got api access I got ChatGPT4 to do this - just not with a proper ReAct pattern - via a tampermonkey extension it wrote me…lol)
- simonw 4y agoI spent about 30 minutes writing the code and 15 minutes writing it up - I haven't spent much time at all testing it and making sure it's robust and reliable. I just wanted to illustrate the concept.
- dragonwriter 4y agoIt’s not particularly robust, but its so accessible that its easy to tweak and improve. The code seems fine, even if clearly not structured the way a “production” product would be. The prompt can definitely use tweaking to improve the ability of ChatGPT to make best use of the actions – particularly, I’ve found it needs a firmer reminder to use valid Python expressions or its tends to pass math-in-English – e.g., with thousands separators, for instance – or other syntactically invalid things to the ‘calculate’ action, but once you’ve got the code and the prompt you’ve done as a starting point, adding actions, tweaking the prompt, etc., is pretty straightforward.